• Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Mains
    • Prelims
  • Current affairs
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Forum
  • Shop
      • Cart

        0
    Have any question?
    (+91) 733 083 3391
    info@iasbee.com
    RegisterLogin
    IAS BEEIAS BEE
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Mains
      • Prelims
    • Current affairs
    • Blog
    • Contact
    • Forum
    • Shop
        • Cart

          0

      CURRENT AFFAIRS

      • Home
      • Blog
      • CURRENT AFFAIRS
      • November 22nd Editorial

      November 22nd Editorial

      • Posted by BEE
      • Categories CURRENT AFFAIRS, Editorials, Mains Capsule
      • Date November 22, 2019

      22nd November 2019

      TOPIC:  Indian Constitution—historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure. (Paper II)

      Discuss the draconian Beggary laws. 

      Introduction

      Two centuries of colonial rule visited many cruelties upon Indians. One form that this took was the criminalization and stigmatism of entire populations that did not “fit in” to a certain, narrow way of life.

      Background

      • Through laws such as the Criminal Tribes Act, indigenous peoples were deemed criminals by birth and herded into concentration camps, where families were separated and forced labour was the norm.
      • While independence and the Constitution were supposed to herald a new dawn, the reality turned out to be different.
      • The post-colonial Indian state replicated many of the worst excesses of the British regime, one example of such being the beggary laws.

      The Beggary laws:

      • Beggary law was enacted in 1958 in Bombay and later extended to many States and UTs.
      • These draconian laws criminalise itinerant and nomadic communities i.e., effectively anyone who does not fit the State’s definition of a “normal” citizen.
      • Beggary laws go substantially beyond criminalizing the act of begging, they criminalise people who are wandering about and who look like they might need to beg at some point.
      • It is evident that the purpose of such provisions is not to protect public peace or prevent crimes, but to effectively “cleanse” these spaces of individuals who appear poor or destitute.
      • The substance of these laws is worsened by the process.
      • People found begging can be arrested without a warrant, and after a summary procedure, thrown into “beggars home” for anything between a year and three years.
      • Upon a “second offence”, the punishment could extend up to seven years.

      Court’s Analysis:

      • Chief Justice observed that by effectively criminalizing poverty, the beggary law violated basic human dignity.
      • The legislation, it noted, was steeped in prejudice against poverty and premised on an absolute presumption of potential criminality of those faced with choicelessness and undeserved want of those who have no support at all, institutional or otherwise and are bereft of resources of any kind.
      • This, coupled with the draconian processes under the Act, violated the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.  

      Conclusion

      The beggary laws belong to the family of punitive constitutionalism. The Jammu and Kashmir high court’s judgment, which explicitly premised upon the unconstitutionality of “invisiblising” a social problem by criminalizing it shows us the exact way in which our Constitution rejects this harsh world view. 

       

      22nd November 2019

      TOPIC: Indian Economy (Paper III)

      Discuss India’s decision on not joining RCEP and its implications.

      Introduction

      India decided not to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). This decision can be seen in the lens of experiences countries have had with free trade agreements (FTAs).

      Background

      • Some have argued that by not signing the RCEP, Indian exporters would miss on exporting to RCEP countries. 
      • India has FTAs with the ASEAN, Japan, and South Korea. Three-fourths of the bilateral trade already happens zero duty.
      • India also has a small preferential trade agreement with China.
      • The mere signing of an FTA does not guarantee an increase in exports. 
      • If import duty in the partner country is high, there is a likelihood of an increase in exports by 10% when this duty becomes zero. 
      • But the chances of exports increasing are low if the import duty of the partner country is low at 1-3%. 
      • FTAs are of no use for exporting to Singapore, Hong Kong as regular import duties are zero.
      • FTAs with Malaysia, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Brunei, etc. benefit few product groups only as more than 60% of imports into these countries happen at zero duty for all countries.
      • Even the high import duties coming down to zero through the FTAs do not guarantee exports. Japan reduced duty from 10% to zero for Indian apparels through an FTA in 2011. But India’s apparel exports to Japan have nosedived from $255 million in 2010 to $152 million in 2018.
      • Non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs) such as special sourcing requirements are generally not negotiated in FTAs. Countries have to resolve these bilaterally.

       

      Flow of Investment

      • Many argue that a lower import duty regime help in getting significant investments.
      • Australia, in 1987, produced 89% of the cars it used. It protected the car industry through a high 45% import duty. But the share of locally produced vehicles came down as the duties were reduced.Today, Australia imports nearly all cars as tariffs came further down to a 5% level. Most manufacturers such as Nissan, Ford, General Motors, Toyota, Mitsubishi, etc. which produced cars in Australia shut shop.
      • India could attract significant investments in the car sector on account of high import duties. This resulted in the development of an indigenous car and auto component industry. India can think of lowering import duties to promote competition.
      • Most investments are a result of the package, such as tax cuts, cheap land, power, etc. offered by the host country.
      • If a country is not the most efficient economy, some level of an import wall helps in getting external investments. Without an import wall, many firms may shift production to the more efficient FTA partner countries for exporting back to the home market.
      • The quality of investments increases as a country moves towards becoming a more efficient economy. Such countries are in an ideal position to become a manufacturing and services hub.

      Way Forward:

      • The FTAs can ensure market access to only the right quality products at competitive prices.
      • Improvement in firm-level competitiveness is a must.
      • The government can lower duties on raw materials and intermediates than on the concerned finished products.
      • It can set up an elaborate quality and standards infrastructure for essential products.

       

      • Share:
      author avatar
      BEE

      Previous post

      November 21st Editorial
      November 22, 2019

      Next post

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (20th November 2019)
      November 22, 2019

      You may also like

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (26th November 2019)
      28 November, 2019

      26th NOVEMBERM, 2019 RAJYA SABHA TELEVISION   DESH-DESHANTAR: SC/ST & Constitutional empowerment Introduction  On 26th November 2019, India is witnessing its 70th year of the Constitution day. The constitution makers has taken into the account of the under privileged section …

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (22nd November 2019)
      28 November, 2019

      22nd NOVEMBER, 2019 RAJYA SABHA TELEVISION   VISHESH: ROLE OF GOVERNOR Introduction  Every time there is a hung assembly, it’s the governor who uses his discretion that often favors the party or alliance at the Centre. Whether it is Maharashtra …

      November 27th Editorial
      27 November, 2019

      27th November 2019 TOPIC:  Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, human resources. (Paper II) Discuss how sanitation cannot be a separate ideal without reference to other forms of deprivation. Introduction India’s high-profile Swacch …

      Search

      iasbee-Logo

      Latest Posts

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (26th November 2019)
      28Nov2019
      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (22nd November 2019)
      28Nov2019
      November 27th Editorial
      27Nov2019
      November 26th Editorial
      27Nov2019
      November 25th Editorial
      27Nov2019

      Latest Courses

      INDIAN POLITY

      INDIAN POLITY

      Free
      ART&CULTURE

      ART&CULTURE

      ₹200.00 ₹99.00
      ART&CULTURE

      ART&CULTURE

      ₹69.00
      ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

      ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

      ₹200.00 ₹99.00
      HISTORY-ANCIENT INDIA

      HISTORY-ANCIENT INDIA

      ₹300.00 ₹99.00
      Indian Economy

      Indian Economy

      ₹299.00 ₹99.00
      iasbee
      (+91) 733 083 3391
      info@iasbee.com
      Facebook Twitter

      Privacy

      • Privacy policy
      • Terms of use
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Place Orders with IASBEE
      • Refund policy

      Links

      • Courses
      • Blog
      • FAQs

      Copyright ©2019 All rights reserved by IASBEE. Powered by Gridlogs.

      Login with your site account

      Lost your password?

      Not a member yet? Register now

      Register a new account

      Are you a member? Login now