• Home
  • About Us
  • Courses
    • Mains
    • Prelims
  • Current affairs
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Forum
  • Shop
      • Cart

        0
    Have any question?
    (+91) 733 083 3391
    info@iasbee.com
    RegisterLogin
    IAS BEEIAS BEE
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Courses
      • Mains
      • Prelims
    • Current affairs
    • Blog
    • Contact
    • Forum
    • Shop
        • Cart

          0

      CURRENT AFFAIRS

      • Home
      • Blog
      • CURRENT AFFAIRS
      • November 15th Editorial

      November 15th Editorial

      • Posted by BEE
      • Categories CURRENT AFFAIRS, Editorials, Mains Capsule
      • Date November 15, 2019

      15th November 2019

      TOPIC: Executive and Judiciary. (Paper II)

      Discuss judicial transparency that will follow now that CJI’s office is under the RTI act.

      Introduction

      Sunlight is the best disinfectant that is often used to highlight the need for disclosure of matters related to the public interest through the RTI mechanism. 

      Background

      • The declaration of assets by ministers and legislators, besides electoral candidates, has shed light on public authorities.
      • It provided the citizenry with more relevant information about their representatives. 

      Judicial transparency

      • Judges of the Supreme Court had refused to share information on their personal assets, citing the lack of public interest.
      •  5-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a “public authority” under the RTI Act.It enables the disclosure of information such as the judges’ personal assets. 
      • The judgment’s majority opinion emphasised the need for transparency and accountability and that “disclosure is a facet of public interest”. 
      • They asserted that judicial independence was not secured by secrecy and argued for the need for proper calibration of transparency in light of the importance of judicial independence.

      Balance with the right to privacy

      • The Bench argued that the right to know under the RTI Act was not absolute.
      • It had to be balanced with the right to privacy of judges. 
      • The key take away from the judgment is that disclosure of the details of serving judges’ personal assets was not a violation of their right to privacy.

      Other parts of the judgment

      • Information related to issues such as judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and procedures mandated in the RTI Act that specifies that views of third parties must be sought. 
      • It lays out the importance of the assessment of public interest in an RTI query.
      • The RTI Act is a strong weapon that enhances accountability, citizen activism, and participatory democracy even if its implementation has come under strain in recent years.

      Conclusion

      The Supreme Court judgment paves the way for greater transparency. It could impinge upon issues such as disclosure under the RTI Act by other institutions such as registered political parties. This is vital as political party financing is a murky area today, marked by opacity and exacerbated by the issue of electoral bonds, precluding citizens from being fully informed on sources of party income.

       

      15th November 2019

      TOPIC: Salient features of Indian Society, Diversity of India. (Paper I)

      Discuss the Sabarimala judgment and its implications.

      Introduction

      Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome.

      Background

      • However, the order of a constitution bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age groups to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic.
      • The order, passed by a majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights.
      • The majority, headed by the CJI Ranjan Gogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have reviewed the question whether an individuals’ right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion.

      The omnibus reconsideration:

      • An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
      • The majority anticipates that similar basic questions on the conflict between individual freedom and constitutionally-protected religious beliefs may arise in other situations too.
      • It cites pending petitions concerning the entry of women into a dargah, the entry of Parsi women married to non-Parsis into an agyari, and the practice of female genital mutilation in this genre.
      • It is well-established that freedom of religion, under Article 25, is subject to public order, morality and health, and it may not be difficult for any court to test the validity of the practice against the restriction on the grounds of a women’s health, and this may not require an exalted panel of seven judges.
      •  In keeping the petitions on Sabarimala pending further, the court has displayed a disquieting inability to stand by its previous transformative judgment.
      • Further, it may lead to a repeat of the unsavory incidents of the last year when religious groups and political activists blocked and attacked women devotees.

      Conclusion

      An omnibus reconsideration of all issues related to religious freedom was not the way out of the serious issues posed by the Sabarimala judgment.

      • Share:
      author avatar
      BEE

      Previous post

      November 14th Editorial
      November 15, 2019

      Next post

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (14th November 2019)
      November 15, 2019

      You may also like

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (26th November 2019)
      28 November, 2019

      26th NOVEMBERM, 2019 RAJYA SABHA TELEVISION   DESH-DESHANTAR: SC/ST & Constitutional empowerment Introduction  On 26th November 2019, India is witnessing its 70th year of the Constitution day. The constitution makers has taken into the account of the under privileged section …

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (22nd November 2019)
      28 November, 2019

      22nd NOVEMBER, 2019 RAJYA SABHA TELEVISION   VISHESH: ROLE OF GOVERNOR Introduction  Every time there is a hung assembly, it’s the governor who uses his discretion that often favors the party or alliance at the Centre. Whether it is Maharashtra …

      November 27th Editorial
      27 November, 2019

      27th November 2019 TOPIC:  Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, human resources. (Paper II) Discuss how sanitation cannot be a separate ideal without reference to other forms of deprivation. Introduction India’s high-profile Swacch …

      Search

      iasbee-Logo

      Latest Posts

      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (26th November 2019)
      28Nov2019
      RAJYA SABHA TV /ALL INDIA RADIO (22nd November 2019)
      28Nov2019
      November 27th Editorial
      27Nov2019
      November 26th Editorial
      27Nov2019
      November 25th Editorial
      27Nov2019

      Latest Courses

      INDIAN POLITY

      INDIAN POLITY

      Free
      ART&CULTURE

      ART&CULTURE

      ₹200.00 ₹99.00
      ART&CULTURE

      ART&CULTURE

      ₹69.00
      ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

      ECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT

      ₹200.00 ₹99.00
      HISTORY-ANCIENT INDIA

      HISTORY-ANCIENT INDIA

      ₹300.00 ₹99.00
      Indian Economy

      Indian Economy

      ₹299.00 ₹99.00
      iasbee
      (+91) 733 083 3391
      info@iasbee.com
      Facebook Twitter

      Privacy

      • Privacy policy
      • Terms of use
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Place Orders with IASBEE
      • Refund policy

      Links

      • Courses
      • Blog
      • FAQs

      Copyright ©2019 All rights reserved by IASBEE. Powered by Gridlogs.

      Login with your site account

      Lost your password?

      Not a member yet? Register now

      Register a new account

      Are you a member? Login now